Men's Memes: Sexual harrassment hysteria makes men wary of women in the workplace

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Sexual harrassment hysteria makes men wary of women in the workplace

A SERIES of high-profile harassment cases has sparked the first signs of “segregation” in the workplace as relationships between the sexes are disrupted by mutual suspicion.

But guess which sex is to 'blame' and which sex will 'suffer' the most and be 'victims' of this?

Yep, you've guessed.

You know, if women decided that they wanted to go around all day smacking dogs on the snout, they would then complain bitterly if one of them got bitten. "Dogs are oppressing us! We're victims!" they would yell. Or if they decided that they wanted to sit down on a pile of flaming coals, and then got a burned behind, they would be screaming "Why didn't a man run to save me! The coals are oppressing me into victim status!"

Women now seem to believe they can behave however they like, and unless men activly shelter them from any unpleasant consequences (and what is considered 'unpleasant' will vary from one woman to another, so you must also be telepathic to please them) then they are being 'victimised'.

So, now women are claiming that there is not only a glass ceiling in the workplace, but glass partitions. Hell, theres so much glass in the workplace these days that its a wonder anyone can walk around. Or, as one man recently commented:

Does anyone notice the resemblence to a mime pretending to be stuck in an imaginary box?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Turn of the tide: feminists begin to regret

Cosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex":

"We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands...this, we thought, is what feminism is about."

70s feminist Fay Weldon now says:

"It is the fault of me and my like, who... got it wrong.

So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined.

We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us.

The pendulum has swung too far over. But it may yet swing back again. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting."

"Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Forget it. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes; at worst you're a write-off. Women are elbowing the men out. The boys get anxious, the girls swagger. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. It is strange that it is left to a woman to suggest, in the normal nurturing way, that men start some kind of movement to promote their gender's status and self-esteem - call it masculinism, brotherism, machoism, what you want - and some mark of the success of the feminist movement, that it needs to be done."

60's feminist Doris Lessing now says:

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

An excerpt from an interview with Joan Rivers:

"She's not with the feminists when it comes to matters of the heart. For her, they're to blame for the current parlous state of our relationships, as depicted in these television Shows (Such as Sex in the city) and films. "I saw this coming. You cannot be equal to a man, you cannot make a man feel 'I don't need you' or 'I'll take my sex when I want it'. All these shows are so sad."

Camille Paglia :

"Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

. . . Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species."