Showing posts with label Women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Women. Show all posts

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Official: Adult women are now less responsible for their own behaviour than children

Highland students face expulsion after viewing topless photo of teacher

File this one under WTF?! Its truly one of those news stories that you couldn't have even made up.

Even this headline is misleading, as it focuses on the boys and makes it sound like they did something naughty, if not outright wrong.

However, the facts are: A female teacher had topless photos of herself on a school-issued ipad. She handed the ipad to some children in her class and told them to browse through it. When the boys saw the topless photo of her she became agitated and ... called the police on the children!

The boys have been punished by an expulsion from the school.

Just imagine for one moment if a male teacher had handed an ipad with naked photos of himself on to a bunch of kids, then called the police on the kids. 

Sunday, September 09, 2012

Many women crave drama and pain in relationships


Many women crave drama and pain in their relationships

This is partially why so many societies seek to place some kind of limit on women's sexual choices

Friday, February 17, 2012

Study: female teachers grade boys lower

Study: female teachers grade boys lower

The consequences of this study should be huge. But I suspect they will just be swept under the carpet.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Misandry, the white feather campaign and World War 1

If the work of our finest War Poets is anything to go by, the target of their resentment was not so much the men at home as the women.

And yet feminists still manage to convince everyone that it was women who were uniquely oppressed in the past.

"The “feather girls” shared this delusion that the Great War was some glorious game. It was easy for them to accuse others of cowardice, knowing that they would never be forced to prove their own bravery."

Monday, July 04, 2011

Are father's redundant or not? You can't have it both ways Mr Cameron

A single mother has just won the right for the taxpayer to fund her to have a child with no father. See here, and here

Lets just set aside for a moment the fact that this woman is already receiving money from the taxpayer, and the fact that taxpayers are already forced to spend untold BILLIONS on supporting single-mothers (who are usually single through their own choices) at a time when pensioners are living in poverty and people are dying due to the NHS rationing certain drugs....

and instead listen to what our Prime Minister has to say about fathers:

"We need to make Britain a genuinely hostile place for fathers who go AWOL. It’s high time runaway dads were stigmatised, and the full force of shame was heaped upon them. They should be looked at like drink drivers, people who are beyond the pale."

Have I missed something here? Am I going insane?

On the one hand the laws of the land think its perfectly reasonable for women to CHOOSE to have children without fathers, and for the taxpayer to be forced to pay for this, then the law and the establishment will also REFUSE to work to ensure fathers who are kicked out of the home are able to see their children, yet at the same time, Cameron is almost inciting violence against absent fathers.

Utterly fucking astonishing.

Well, it would be if you weren't already aware of the lack of values displayed by the psychopaths who seem to populate governments.

So, when it suits women, fathers are totally unnecessary, and the costs for having a child are supposed to be the responsibility of the taxpayer. But if its at all possible to blame a man, then through his absence and/or lack of paying for his own child he becomes the worst sort of scum. How is that not self-contradictory?

Equally astonishing is the claim of the mother that: "‘I believe that it is my right as a woman to be a mother. The fact that I am single is irrelevant.."

When was this right established and by whom? And by what authority did they ascertain that the taxpayers - including starving pensioners and dying cancer victims - should fund this 'right'?

And who established that this right was more important than the rights of:

children to know their fathers?
old people, who have paid taxes all their lives, to get a decent pension?
fathers to be treated as important?
hard-earning taxpayers not to have their own money taken away for non-essential, 'lifestyle' services for women?

And to rub salt in the wound, we also learn that this woman says she " wanted a child for so long and I tried to get pregnant the normal way for ten years – even when I was with men I didn’t really want to be with."

Sounds to me like she was willing to TRICK a man into supplying her with his sperm, then most likely kick him out of her life, and the life of the future child.

And this is EXACTLY what hundreds of thousands of women in this country do, and as a taxpayer I am forced to pay for it, and also for the costs of social breakdown that ensue from this culture of fatherless children.

I urge all Brits to NEVER vote for Cameron, and to support whole-heartedly fathers for justice:


Sunday, May 22, 2011

Politician in trouble for saying that not all rapes are the same

Peter Hitchens: Some rapes ARE worse than others...there, I've said it

"Revolutionary feminism, which regards all men as predators and sees the married family as a sordid prison, has scared most politicians, most judges, most journalists, most civil servants – and most people – into accepting its nasty dogmas."

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Slutwalks

Thousands of women will take to the streets next month in the first anti-sexist "SlutWalks"


You could use the same 'logic' to argue that its fine to leave expensive valuables laying around on the seat of your car at night. Idiots.

Sunday, January 09, 2011

Women want to stay at home and make the husband work

Despite years of equality campaigning and advances for women in the workplace, 64 per cent say they aspire to find a husband who brings home a larger pay packet than themselves. However, only 19 per cent want their other half to be better educated than they are.


In other words, women don't want men to have any more educational resources expended on them, despite the fact that they want men to work harder, longer and in more complex jobs. Equally, they clearly want lots of educational resources expended on THEM despite the fact that they would aspire to stay at home.


Thursday, October 21, 2010

Women's retirement age goes up

Women to work six years longer than their mothers

How 'liberating' are you finding your feminism now, girls? lol

Of course, the other way of looking at this is that for years and years, women have been getting a massive free ride out of the system. Many women have retired at 60 and gone on to live until 90 or 100! Whilst many hard working men have performed physically demanding jobs, retired at 65 and died soon after, due to the toll the work took on them.

Friday, August 20, 2010

The 'cougar' myth

The cougar myth: how women still seek older men, and the toyboy trend never really existed

This myth was popularised by 'liberal' female journalists. The evidence they provided for it was typically that of several celebrity women who were dating younger men. I deconstructed this myth years ago in an article called 'the Oedipussy complex'.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Women going for 'bad boys'