Men's Memes: Stephen Fry: women only have sex with men to manipulate them

Sunday, October 31, 2010

Stephen Fry: women only have sex with men to manipulate them

Stephen Fry has outraged feminists in an astonishing outburst where he claimed that women only use sex to manipulate men into having a relationship

2 comments:

Ping Jockey said...: ...'Why would he believe that women could be so disgusted by men?...'

Gee, maybe by seeing how feminists/Western women have acted towards men for the last 40 to 50 years?
Or maybe by the hatred and misogny modern women vomit on men every day?
Or maybe by the way men are crapped on every day by the feminist-controlled media, government, and churches?
Other than that, I can't understand why!!

As for Fry being gay and the feminists criticizing that he would therefore not know anything about women -- well, sometimes, in order to see what is painfully obvious, you need an outside observer to point it out to you.
We heterosexual men could do well to pay attention to his observations.; 3:04 pm
Anonymous said...: I have wondered the same thing and see the same observations. Women always do have to "get" something material out of sex. Either money or security or something. If they get mad at you the first thing that they cut off is sex, this is for "something", its called "control". Women do use sex, men enjoy it. Women use the male sex drive to control men. They have no ethics and are manipulating creatures. I love women but this is all perfectly true, think about it ladies.; 2:11 pm

Turn of the tide: feminists begin to regret

Cosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex":

"We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands...this, we thought, is what feminism is about."

70s feminist Fay Weldon now says:

"It is the fault of me and my like, who... got it wrong.

So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined.

We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us.

The pendulum has swung too far over. But it may yet swing back again. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting."

"Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Forget it. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes; at worst you're a write-off. Women are elbowing the men out. The boys get anxious, the girls swagger. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. It is strange that it is left to a woman to suggest, in the normal nurturing way, that men start some kind of movement to promote their gender's status and self-esteem - call it masculinism, brotherism, machoism, what you want - and some mark of the success of the feminist movement, that it needs to be done."

60's feminist Doris Lessing now says:

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

An excerpt from an interview with Joan Rivers:

"She's not with the feminists when it comes to matters of the heart. For her, they're to blame for the current parlous state of our relationships, as depicted in these television Shows (Such as Sex in the city) and films. "I saw this coming. You cannot be equal to a man, you cannot make a man feel 'I don't need you' or 'I'll take my sex when I want it'. All these shows are so sad."

Camille Paglia :

"Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

. . . Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species."