Men's Memes: Feminism's latest sexual apartheid

Friday, April 28, 2006

Feminism's latest sexual apartheid

Hey, did you hear the one about the feminist train that refuses to let any men on board! And, guess what..? They even painted it with pink stripes!

Wheres the punchline? Sadly there isn't one as I'm NOT JOKING. This is happening for real.

Although, two things that the feminist idiots who came up with this idea didn't think of:

1. Women already bemoan the lack of chivilry in modern men not giving up their seat on a train for them (tut tut boy! Don't you know who your superiors are??), but they sure as hell aren't going to find any chivilry in an all-woman carriage! For instance, if any GENUINELY dangerous man enters the train carriage (and he wouldn't be put off by the silly 'no men' rule) and starts to attack the women, there will be no man around to risk himself to help them. And what do a group of women do in a dangerous situation? Risk their lives to save another woman? Nah! They scream. Imagine the behaviour of a group of hens confronted by a fox and you'll get the idea.

2. 'All women' carriages will leave lots of... 'all male' carriages! Hm, what if those nasty men start to talk to eachother, and come up with business ideas, and help eachother. Oh No!! They might co-operate and give eachother advantages! Its....its..... the old boy network!!

Now there's something to give the feminists more sleepless nights about. Although I'm sure a law to stop men talking to eachother will be next.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Turn of the tide: feminists begin to regret

Cosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex":

"We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands...this, we thought, is what feminism is about."

70s feminist Fay Weldon now says:

"It is the fault of me and my like, who... got it wrong.

So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined.

We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us.

The pendulum has swung too far over. But it may yet swing back again. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting."

"Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Forget it. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes; at worst you're a write-off. Women are elbowing the men out. The boys get anxious, the girls swagger. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. It is strange that it is left to a woman to suggest, in the normal nurturing way, that men start some kind of movement to promote their gender's status and self-esteem - call it masculinism, brotherism, machoism, what you want - and some mark of the success of the feminist movement, that it needs to be done."

60's feminist Doris Lessing now says:

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

An excerpt from an interview with Joan Rivers:

"She's not with the feminists when it comes to matters of the heart. For her, they're to blame for the current parlous state of our relationships, as depicted in these television Shows (Such as Sex in the city) and films. "I saw this coming. You cannot be equal to a man, you cannot make a man feel 'I don't need you' or 'I'll take my sex when I want it'. All these shows are so sad."

Camille Paglia :

"Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

. . . Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species."