Men's Memes: The Church: supporting socialism over fathers

Monday, February 06, 2012

The Church: supporting socialism over fathers

Former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey has criticised Church of England bishops for opposing the government's £26,000-a-year cap on benefits.

In a nutshell, the UK is now about a zillion-squillion pounds in debt thanks to years of governments squandering every penny of taxpayers money, then borrowing even more (oh tomorrow's taxpayers can pay that back!) in order to fund an increasingly bloated welfare state. In order to try and save a bit of money, the current government was looking to put a limit on how much benefit money a household can receive. The limit was to be £26,000 per anum (or around $41,000 US), more than many WORKING families take home.

The cap was defeated, in part due to a group of bishops, arguing that it would make thousands of children less well off.

So where were those bishops as the role of the father and as marriage was systematically destroyed? The suffering and impoverishment of children (material, emotional and spiritual) that flowed from that has been immeasurable. Yet there was not one peep of protest out of them.

Are our religious leaders just a bunch of socialist feminists who don't give a damn about the suffering of children when it doesn't suit their political cause?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...: Hello very cool site!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I'll bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally…I'm happy to seek out so many helpful info here within the submit, we need develop extra strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . . car insurance in florida; 4:35 am

Post a Comment

Turn of the tide: feminists begin to regret

Cosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex":

"We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands...this, we thought, is what feminism is about."

70s feminist Fay Weldon now says:

"It is the fault of me and my like, who... got it wrong.

So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined.

We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us.

The pendulum has swung too far over. But it may yet swing back again. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting."

"Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Forget it. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes; at worst you're a write-off. Women are elbowing the men out. The boys get anxious, the girls swagger. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. It is strange that it is left to a woman to suggest, in the normal nurturing way, that men start some kind of movement to promote their gender's status and self-esteem - call it masculinism, brotherism, machoism, what you want - and some mark of the success of the feminist movement, that it needs to be done."

60's feminist Doris Lessing now says:

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

An excerpt from an interview with Joan Rivers:

"She's not with the feminists when it comes to matters of the heart. For her, they're to blame for the current parlous state of our relationships, as depicted in these television Shows (Such as Sex in the city) and films. "I saw this coming. You cannot be equal to a man, you cannot make a man feel 'I don't need you' or 'I'll take my sex when I want it'. All these shows are so sad."

Camille Paglia :

"Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

. . . Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species."