Men's Memes: Accusations against Paul McCartney

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Accusations against Paul McCartney

Heather Mills is accusing her estranged husband Paul McCartney of repeated violence against her.

Yesterday, all his troubles seemed so far away, but it was only a matter of time before Heather Mills started hitting below the belt in order to get her hands on McCartney's millions (God, I'm starting to write like a tabloid journalist!). The whole thing is obviously a load of lies and exagerations made up to at the very least plant doubt in people's minds about him. But to me they just don't ring true at all. McCartney is a man who has lived in the spotlight of publicity all his life, and lives a good deal of his life surrounded by staff. If he was really such a physically violent and vindictive character then this would have almost certainly come out before. He was married to Linda for God knows how many years, and I can't imagine that she was the sort of woman who would have put up with being treated violently. The accusations just don't ring true.

Its ironic that the man who sang in one of his most famous songs "Will you still need me when I'm 64?" is now being shafted like this in his 64th year.

Maybe one day soon, such wealthy men will realise that if they donated even a tiny percentage of their fortunes to the men's movement, they could start to combat such unfair treatment of men in divorce cases, and potentially save themselves millions and millions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Turn of the tide: feminists begin to regret

Cosmopolitan (The women's magazine that urges women to use men for sex) Editor Lorraine Candy has a change of mind and now urges women not to have "Soul-less sex":

"We didn't feel ashamed about one-night stands...this, we thought, is what feminism is about."

70s feminist Fay Weldon now says:

"It is the fault of me and my like, who... got it wrong.

So were we wrong, we feminists, setting women free? The results have been devastating – greater than we ever imagined.

We steamed ahead, changing the world with too little caution, and I hope the future will forgive us.

The pendulum has swung too far over. But it may yet swing back again. Societies, thank God, tend to be self-righting."

"Once a man could look forward to starting a family and the dignity that came from being the provider. Forget it. At best as a man you're decorative, look after the kids and earn a bit sometimes; at worst you're a write-off. Women are elbowing the men out. The boys get anxious, the girls swagger. The male suicide rate goes up, female down. Twenty-eight per cent of us now live in single person households - a lonely and unnatural state - and most of the 28 per cent consist of young men. It is strange that it is left to a woman to suggest, in the normal nurturing way, that men start some kind of movement to promote their gender's status and self-esteem - call it masculinism, brotherism, machoism, what you want - and some mark of the success of the feminist movement, that it needs to be done."

60's feminist Doris Lessing now says:

"It is time we began to ask who are these women who continually rubbish men. The most stupid, ill-educated and nasty woman can rubbish the nicest, kindest and most intelligent man and no one protests.

Men seem to be so cowed that they can't fight back, and it is time they did."

An excerpt from an interview with Joan Rivers:

"She's not with the feminists when it comes to matters of the heart. For her, they're to blame for the current parlous state of our relationships, as depicted in these television Shows (Such as Sex in the city) and films. "I saw this coming. You cannot be equal to a man, you cannot make a man feel 'I don't need you' or 'I'll take my sex when I want it'. All these shows are so sad."

Camille Paglia :

"Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

. . . Even now, with all vocations open, I marvel at the rarity of the woman driven by artistic or intellectual obsession, that self-mutilating derangement of social relationship which, in its alternate forms of crime and ideation, is the disgrace and glory of the human species."